A Cultural Governance Coalition in Regeneration A Case Study of Historical Quanzhou City
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Compared with the gradual and long exploration processes typical of European and American countries, China experienced a period marked by extremely high-speed modernisation and urbanisation, following the Land Reform. This is exemplified by a great number of urban reconstruction projects which have changed the traditional fabric of most cities. Yet, following the trend of cultural consumption since the late 1990s, numerous integrated restoration projects for historic districts were implemented to promote tourism as a promising industry to sustain economic growth. As a consequence of growth-oriented urban entrepreneurship, public spaces in these historic urban areas have also been perceptibly privatised. To a large extent, the capital and the authority of the local government directs the future prospect of the historic urban landscape in Chinese cities.
On the other hand, development-oriented urban construction stimulates a rise in awareness of the need for protection strategies to conserve historic urban fabric. On a global scale, the public sector has begun to introspect on urban governance under the spirit of entrepreneurship. The urban renewal has now been extended to urban regeneration and the previous public-private partnership has been substituted with a multi-sectoral cooperative model. In recent years, the Chinese central government has proposed the core concept of “Seeing people, Seeing things, Seeing life”, which is re-orientated towards historic-city regeneration as a way of promoting “Micro-renewal and Micro-disturbance”. Among such activities, the use of exhibitions as a strategy for simultaneous spatial transformation and activation has gradually formed a common path, encouraging many cities to regenerate historic urban areas. This article is based on on this reorientation, taking Quanzhou as an example, making a critical observation on the new form of public space it has produced, and digs into the operational mechanism behind it as well as the possibility for publicness.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Bolton, R. (1989). Figments of the Public: Architecture and Debt. Threshold, 4: 44-49.
Britton, S. (1991). Tourism, Capital, and Place: Towards a Critical Geography of Tourism. Environment and planning D: society and space, 9(4): 451-478.
Carr, S. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge University Press.
Carter, E. & Donald, J. (1993). Space and Place: Theories of Identity and Location. Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.
Chen, L. & Zhang, W. (2010). The Change and Reconstruction of Local Culture in Response to Urban Renewal and Globalization: A Case Study of Shichahai Historic District. Progress in geography, 29(6): 649-656.
Dong, G. (2006). A Fifty-year Evolutionary Record of Ancient Capital of Beijing. Nanjing: Southeast University Press.
CLG (2008). Transforming Places; Changing Lives: A Framework for Regeneration. Communities and Local Government, London.
IPF (2009). Urban Regeneration: Opportunities for Property Investment. Investment Property Forum (IPF), London.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social text, (25/26): 56-80.
Kung, S. (2006). Social Network Booting, Urban Micro-regeneration Acting. Time Architecture, 2016 (4): 29-33.
Kwok, Y. C. J. (2011). The Production of Space in East Asian Cities: Urban Cultures of Tokyo, Shanghai and Hong Kong. Taipei: Garden City.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development (Vol. 8). Franz Steiner Verlag.
He, S., & Wu, F. (2009). China's Emerging Neoliberal Urbanism: Perspectives From Urban Dedevelopment. Antipode, 41(2): 282-304.
Healey, P., Davoudi, S., Tavsanoglu, S., O’Toole, M. and Usher, D. (eds.) (1992). Rebuilding the City: Property-Led Urban Regeneration, London: E & FN Spon.
Herbert, D. (2000). Towns and Cities. In V. Gardiner and H. Matthews (eds.), The Changing Geography of the United Kingdom (pp. 190–212), London: Routledge, 3rd e.
Hidaka, T., & Tanaka, M. (2001). Japanese Public Space as Defined by Event. In Public Places in Asia Pacific Cities (pp.107-118). Springer Netherlands.
Huang Y. (2004). Houhai Family: Living in the Lost Landscape. In Zhang Z. (eds.), China in 2004 - Rising China and the World (pp.121-126). China Citic Press.
Jacobs, J. (1992). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
Kang M. (2012). Urban Conservation in the Booty Capitalist City. Router: a journal of cultural studies, (15): 230-241.
MacLeod, G. (2002). From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a ‘Revanchist City’? On the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow’s Renaissance. Antipode, 34(3): 602-624.
Sennett, R. (2017). The Fall of Public Man. WW Norton & Company.
Quanzhou Planning Bureau (2007), Quanzhou Historic City Protection and the Remediation Planning Specification. Quanzhou: Quanzhou Planning Bureau.
Roberts, P. & Sykes, H. (1999). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: SAGE
Rowe, P. (2005). East Asia Modern: Shaping the Contemporary City. London: Reaktion.
Shi, Y. (2015). Becoming Citizens: State and Individual in Inner City Renewal and Urban Social Movements. Beijing: Social sciences academic press.
Smith, N. (2002). New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy. Antipode, 34(3): 427-450.
Su, X., (2015). Urban Entrepreneurialism and the Commodification of Heritage in China. Urban Studies, 52(15): 2874-2889.
Tallon, A. (2013). Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge.
Turok, I. (1992). Property-led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo? Environment and Planning A, 24: 361–379.
Wang C., Shen M. & Lin C. (2009). Politics of Boundary-making in Ethnic Public Spaces: Southeast Asian Landscapes of Consumption in Outer Taipei Metropolitan Area. Taiwan Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 6(1): 4-48.
Whitehand, J. W. R. and Gu K. (2007). Urban Conservation in China: Historical Development, Current Practice and Morphological Approach. The Town Planning Review, 78(5): 643-670.
Yang, D. (2006). City Monsoon: Cultural Spirit of Beijing and Shanghai. Beijing: New Star Press.
Zhang, J. (2014). Study on Land Redevelopment and Management of Inner City in Beijing under Perspective of Historic Urban Quarters Protection. Beijing: Capital Normal University Press.
Zhao, Z. (2002). The Characteristics of Chinese Historic Cultural Cities and Their Preservation. City planning review 26(7): 35-38.
Zhao, H. (2012). The restructuring and preservation of Hutong and courtyards horses in the inner city of Beijing. Doctoral Dissertation. Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Zou, C. (2015). David Harvey’s Geographical Critique of Capitalism. Homeward Publishing.
Zukin, S. (1996). The Cultures of Cities. Wiley-Blackwell.