Placemaking in Practice. Lessons learned from activating public space on campus
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
University campuses offer unique environments rich with opportunities to test, challenge and innovate. Yearning for possibilities of social interaction and the need for better, livelier public spaces on campus, students from the Master of Urbanism Studies program at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm, Sweden have facilitated Placemaking Week on campus for two consecutive years. The tools of placemaking were put into action as students organized the inaugural Placemaking Week at KTH. The project was collaborative by nature in every aspect of the process, challenging the students to navigate the complex interplay between public and private actors. To achieve the partnerships necessary to initiate Placemaking Week, stakeholder’s strategic drivers and potential roles were defined early in the process. All influential stakeholders were engaged, as understanding their concerns and working with them created strategic partnerships which otherwise may have acted as obstacles. These partnerships were important to the program’s sustainability, co-producing a long-term strategy together with the stakeholders as the cohort of students change each year.
Through the approach and execution of each Placemaking Week, the potential of placemaking as a tool to foster community was assessed, formally studied and documented for learning purposes. The results of this study demonstrated that space could be made livelier and provide better opportunities for people to spontaneously interact, even with stringently limited time and resources. Further, Placemaking Week has provided content for the campus plan and contributed to building a trust-based relationship among stakeholders. With each year, the implementation process enables these relationships grow. Finally, the recurrence of Placemaking Week, which has been executed for the third year in a row, shows positive signs of embedding itself in the campus and student culture.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental Psychology Matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 541-579.
Jensenius, A.R. (2012). Disciplinarities: intra, cross, multi, inter, trans. Available at: www.arj.no/.2012/03/12/disciplinarities-2.
Karssenberg, H., Laven, J., Glaser, M. and Van’t Hoff, M. (2016). The City at Eye Level. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.
MacIver, M. (2010). Eric Reynolds, Master of Low-cost, High-return Public Space Interventions in London and NYC. Project for Public Spaces.
Petcou, C. and Petrescu, D. (2015). R-URBAN or how to co-produce a resilient city. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, (15), 249-262.
Project for Public Spaces. (2007) What Is Placemaking? Available at: https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking.
Rittel, H. and Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
Verplanken, B. (2018). The Psychology of Habit: Theory, Mechanisms, Change and Contexts. Berlin, Springer.