Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 Lock-down on Public Spaces through a Systems Modelling Approach
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This paper offers a Human Factors and Ergonomic & Sociotechnical Systems (HFE & STS) methodology to assist in the exploration and description of COVID-19 lockdown impacts on public spaces in Queensland, Australia. The approach utilises an existing - before COVID - systems model of an archetype public space to identify activities that were restricted in public space, and how such restrictions affect system performance. First an overview of the HFE & STS system modelling approach, Cognitive Work Analysis, is provided and we present the systems model of an archetype public space. Next, the range of lockdown restrictions on public space activity are identified in the model and the system's implications on community and individual wellbeing are explored. In conclusion, the necessity for new activities and functions of public space, post COVID-19, are reflected upon and considered from a systems standpoint.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020). Massive boost to outdoor exercise in Sydney's green spaces during coronavirus, survey finds. Retrieved from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-28/sydneys-green-space-use-booms-during-covid-19/12400104?utm_source=abc_news&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_content=mail&utm_campaign=abc_news.
Australian Government (2011). Creating Places for People — an urban design protocol for Australian cities. Infrastructure Australia. Retrieved from https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/creating-places-people-urban-design-protocol-australian-cities.
Bisantz, A. M., Roth, E., Brickman, B., Gosbee, L. L., Hettinger, L., & McKinney, J. (2003). Integrating cognitive analyses in a large-scale system design process. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 177–206.
Burton, E., Mitchell, L., & Lynne Mitchell, M. E. S. (2006). Inclusive urban design: Streets for life. Elsevier.
Cornelissen, M., Salmon, P. M., & Young, K. L. (2013). Same but Different? Understanding Road User Behaviour at Intersections Using Cognitive Work Analysis. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14(6), 592–615.
Degen, M. M., & Rose, G. (2012). The sensory experiencing of urban design: the role of walking and perceptual memory. Urban studies, 49(15), 3271-3287.
Freeman, S., & Eykelbosh, A. (2020). COVID-19 and outdoor safety: Considerations for use of outdoor recreational spaces. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health. Public Health Agency of Canada.
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and urban planning, 94(3-4), 264-275.
Jenkins, D. P., Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., & Walker, G. H. (2010). A New Approach for Designing Cognitive Artefacts to Support Disaster Management. Ergonomics, 53(3), 617–635.
Jenkins, D. P., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Walker, G. H. (2009). Cognitive Work Analysis: Coping with Complexity. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Lees, L. (2010). Planning urbanity? Environment and Pla nning A, 42(10), 2302–2308.
Low, S., Taplin, D., & Scheld, S. (2009). Rethinking urban parks: Public space and cultural diversity. University of Texas Press.
Lévy J (1997) La mesure de l’urbanité. Urbanisme, 296, 58-61.
Missen, L., Stevens, N. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2017). A Sociotechnical Systems Analysis Approach to Playground Design. Proceedings from Contemporary Ergonomics & Human Factors, 35–42.
Montgomery J (1998) Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3(1). 93–116. DOI: 10.1080/13574809808724418.
Naikar, N. (2013). Work Domain Analysis: Concepts, Guidelines, and Cases. CRC Press.
Patorniti, N. P., Stevens, N. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2017). A Systems Approach to City Design: Exploring the Compatibility of Sociotechnical Systems. Habitat International, 66, 42–48.
Patorniti, N. P., Stevens, N. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2018). A Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Understand Complex Urban Systems: A Global Transdisciplinary Perspective. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(6), 281–296.
Queensland Health (2020). Queensland Government Health Department, Restrictions in Queensland. Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from: https://www.qld.gov.au/health/conditions/health-alerts/coronavirus-covid-19/current-status/public-health-directions.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley.
Salmon, P. M., Read, G. J., & Stevens, N. J. (2016). Who is in Control of Road Safety? A STAMP Control Structure Analysis of the Road Transport System in Queensland, Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 96, 140–151.
Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., & Stanton, N. A. (2016). Pilot Error Versus Sociotechnical Systems Failure: A Distributed Situation Awareness Analysis of Air France 447. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(1), 64–79.
Stevens, N. J. (2016). Sociotechnical Urbanism: New Systems Ergonomics perspectives on Land Use Planning and Urban Design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(4), 443–451.
Stevens, N. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2014). Safe Places for Pedestrians: Using Cognitive Work Analysis to Consider the Relationships between the Engineering and Urban Design of Footpaths. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72, 257–266.
Stevens, N. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2015). New Knowledge for Built Environments: Exploring Urban Design from Socio-technical System Perspectives. International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, 200–211.
Stevens, N. J., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., & Stanton, N. A. (2018). Human Factors in Land Use Planning and Urban Design: Methods, Practical Guidance, and Applications. CRC Press.
Tavares, S. G., & Swaffield, S. (2017). Urban Comfort in a Future Compact City: Analysis of Open space Qualities in the Rebuilt Christchurch Central City. Landscape Review, 17(2), 5–23. https://journals.lincoln.ac.nz/index.php/lr/article/view/1035.
Tavares, S. G., Swaffield, S., & Stewart, E. J. (2019). A case-based methodology for investigating urban comfort through interpretive research and microclimate analysis in post-earthquake Christchurch, New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317725318.
Van Diepen AML and Musterd S (2009) Lifestyles and the city: connecting daily life to urbanity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24: 331–345.
Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Jenkins, D. P. (2008). A Review of Sociotechnical Systems Theory: A Classic Concept for new Command and Control Paradigms. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(6), 479–499.