Where's the "Public" in Public Art Three Narratives from documenta 14
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This paper analyses five public art projects exhibited in documenta 14 in Athens in 2017 that redefine and interact with the public space and therefore, form three different narratives on public space. These narratives are outlined according to the different interpretations of ‘public space’, ‘public sphere’ and democracy by the various artists. Our argument is structured as follows; firstly, we present an analysis of public art and its basic features drawing from contemporary literature. Secondly, we provide a number of key facts regarding documenta and documenta 14, outlining the main reasons we selected it as a reference point. Thirdly, we describe the three narratives about public space that we came up with after our field research and interviews with the respective artists: Sanja Iveković, Joar Nango, Rasheed Araeen, Mattin and Rick Lowe. We then discuss the relations between them and develop a model that unravels the way artists explore the public domain, look for locations, and redefine public space and the lived experience in the city. To do so, we engage with theoretical approaches as well as elaborations on specific artworks that engage the shifts and changes of the lived urban experience through art.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Arendt, H, (1968 [1954]) Between Past and Future. Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Meridian Books.
Bal-Blanc, P. (2017) “Mattin” in Latimer, Q., and Szymczyk, A., (eds). documenta 14: Daybook. Athens and Kasel: PRESTEL. ISBN 978-3-7913-5655-6.
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells - Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London and New York: Verso.
Bravo, L. (2018) “Public Urban Happiness, that is the making of our own world”. The Journal of Public Space, 3(2), 1-4, DOI 10.32891/jps.v3i2.1116.
Briggs, R. (2018) “Using drawing as a tool to explore public space”. The Journal of Public Space, 3(2), 115-148, DOI 10.32891/jps.v3i2.1112.
Butler, J. (2011) “ Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street”. [online]. Lecture held in Venice, 7 September 2011, in the framework of the series The State of Things, organized by the Office for Contemporary Art Norway (OCA). Available at: https://transversal.at/transversal/1011/butler/en [last visited October 25, 2020].
Cartiere, C. (2008) “Coming in from the cold: a public art history” in Cartiere, C., Willis, S. (eds). The practice of public art, pp. 7-17. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cartiere, C. (2016) “Through the lens of social practice: considerations on a public art history in progress” in Cartiere, C., Zebracki, M. (eds). The everyday practice of public art, pp. 13-26. London and New York: Routledge.
Deutsche, R. (1992) “Art and public space: questions of democracy”. Social Text, 34–53.
Deutsche, R. (1998) “Public art and its uses” in Senie, H., Webster, S. (eds). Critical issues in public art: content, context, and controversy, pp. 158-170. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Fraser, N. (1990) “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”. Social Text, No. 25/26, 56-80.
Habermas, J. (1991 [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Hillary, F. (2018) “A situated practice”, The Journal of Public Space, 3(2), pp. 149-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v3i2.1113.
Hopkins, C. (2017) “Joar Nango” in Latimer, Q., and Szymczyk, A., (eds). documenta 14: Daybook. Athens and Kasel: PRESTEL. ISBN 978-3-7913-5655-6.
Kester, G. (2013) Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art (2nd edition). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, UK: University of California Press.
Krensky, B. & Steffen S. (2009) Engaging classrooms and communities through art: a guide to designing and implementing community-based art education. Lanham: AltaMira.
Kwon, M. (2002) One place after another: site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press.
Lacy, S. (1994) “Debated Territory: Toward a Critical Language for Public Art” in Lacy, S. (ed). Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, pp 171-185. Seatle, Washington: Bay Press.
Lippard, L., R. (2014) Undermining: A Wild Ride Through Land Use, Politics, and Art in the Changing West. New York: The New Press. ISBN: 978-1-59558-619-3.
Majaca, A. (2017) “Sanja Iveković” in Latimer, Q., and Szymczyk, A., (eds). documenta 14: Daybook. Athens and Kasel: PRESTEL. ISBN 978-3-7913-5655-6.
Massey, D. (1991) “A global sense of place”. Marxism Today, 38: 24-29.
Massey, D. and Rose, G. (2003) Personal views: public art research project. Milton Keynes: Art Point Trust and Milton Keynes Council.
McCormick, M. (2018) “The Public Voice”. The Journal of Public Space, 3(2), 5-12, DOI 10.32891/jps.v3i2.1107
Merlino, D. & Stewart, S. (2016) “Creating the global network: developing social and community practice in higher education” in Cartiere, C., Zebracki, M. (eds). The everyday practice of public art, pp. 85-102. London and New York: Routledge.
Miles, M. (1997) Art, space and the city: public art and urban futures. London: Routledge.
Milevska, S. (2016) “„Infelicitous“ Participatory Acts on the Neoliberal Stage - Participatory art’s promises and hopes for democratization of society”. Participate - KULTUR AKTIV GESTALTEN, Issue 07 (10.2016), pp 19-29. Available at: https://www.p-art-icipate.net/infelicitous-participatory-acts-on-the-neoliberal-stage/# [last visited October 25, 2020].
Ray, G. (2017) “Rasheed Araeen” in Latimer, Q., and Szymczyk, A., (eds). documenta 14: Daybook. Athens and Kasel: PRESTEL. ISBN 978-3-7913-5655-6.
Siebenhaar, K. (2017) Documenta A brief history of an exhibition and its contexts. Berlin and Kassel: B&S Siebenhaar Verlaszyg.
Szewczyk, M. (2017) “Rick Lowe” in Latimer, Q., and Szymczyk, A., (eds). documenta 14: Daybook. Athens and Kasel: PRESTEL. ISBN 978-3-7913-5655-6.
Szymczyk, A. (2017) “Repeatability and heterogeneity-learning and working from Athens” in Latimer, Q., and Szymczyk, A., (eds). documenta 14 Reader. Athens and Kasel: PRESTEL. ISBN 978-3-7913-5657-0
Upton, D. (1997) “Seen, Unseen, and Scene” in Groth, P. and Bressi, T. (eds). Understanding Ordinary Landscapes, pp. 174-179. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zebracki, M. (2016) “The everyday agonistic life after the unveiling: lived experiences from a public art World Café” in Cartiere, C., Zebracki, M. (eds). The everyday practice of public art, pp. 64-82, London and New York: Routledge.