The Intangible Values of Placemaking in Engaging Youth for Activating and Shaping Places
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Placemaking represents a multifunctional approach to urban design that brings together communities around places to foster their sense of belonging and enhance the identity of urban spaces. These places represent the backbone of the city, not only for their physical dimension, but also for social and cultural interactions, where youth have an active role in envisioning a new future for cities by actively participating in placemaking processes, acquiring a strong sense of ownership, and creating youth-friendly places. In that vision, schools can boost this approach by starting to rethink public spaces around them together with students. This study addresses, firstly, the necessity to recognise the intangible values of urban projects by assessing the values of a placemaking process when no physical changes have yet been realised. Secondly, it delves into the benefits of engaging youth in the creation of inclusive and sustainable cities. It examines how youth engagement in these processes can be advantageous and how schools can play a crucial role in the development of public spaces by participating in placemaking activities.
To address these research questions and evaluate the intangible values, an “Impacts Assessment Framework” was developed. This tool helps reconsider challenges by expanding their scope and seeking solutions. The framework was also used to evaluate the “Carpi Campus” experience, assessing the impacts of intangible values from the initial phase, even before physical changes were implemented. The intangible values of placemaking in engaging youth include understanding and addressing complex issues pedagogically, training in active citizenship (including typically excluded individuals in urban planning), and fostering new design abilities for envisioning future scenarios.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Almeida, I. Batista, J. S. and Lourenco, F. (2020) ‘’Placemaking with teenagers. Experiences driven from thematic workshops on urban planning’ in Smaniotto Costa, et al. (eds.) Co-creation of public open places. Practice, Reflection, Learning. C3Places Project. Lisbon: Lusófona University Press, pp. 109-123.
Campioli, S. and Peraboni, C. (2019) ‘How can we plan better cities for all?’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities IV, Spatial, Design, Landscape & Socio-economic Dimensions, Chania (Creta - Grecia), University of Thessaly, Editor Professor Aspa Gospodini.
Campioli, S. (2020) Città inclusiva e senza limiti. Progettare luoghi per le persone nella società contemporanea. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore.
CENSIS (Centro Studi Investimenti Sociali) (2023) ‘I sonnambuli. A chapter dedicated to the Italian Society’, Annual Report on the social situation of the Italian country [Online]. Availble at: https://www.censis.it/rapporto-annuale/i-sonnambuli [Accessed: 23 January 2024].
Chrysostomou, K. (2021) ‘Comparative national report of “Placemaking for inclusion” framework’ in Research Report of Place Make it, D2.1 [Online]. Available from: https://placemaking.4learning.eu/outputs/ [Accessed: 10 January 2024].
Colafranceschi, D. and Nogué, J. (2021) ‘Abitare l’intangibile: paesaggio e spazio pubblico’, (Editorial) Ri-Vista. Research for landscape architecture, 19(2) [Online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.36253/rv-12447 [Accessed: 10 January 2024].
Design Council (2015) Design Methods Step 1: Discover, [Online]. Available from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/archive/articles/design-methods-step-1-discover/ [Accessed: 23 January 2024].
Engholm, I. (2021) Quick guide to design thinking. Copenaghen: Strandberg publishingFranciosi S., et al. (2020) Com’è cambiata la scuola italiana dopo il Covid? [Online]. Available from: https://www.erickson.it/it/mondo-erickson/articoli/cambiata-la-scuola-italiana-dopo-il-covid/ [Accessed: 15 January 2024].
Faglioni, C. (2022) Carpi campus. Un processo di co-progettazione per la riqualificazione degli spazi esterni degli istituti di scuola superiore. Master Degree Thesis of the School of Architecture Urban Planning Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano.
Gardner, J., et al. (2018) ‘Inclusive healthy places. A Guide to Inclusion & Health in Public Space: Learning Globally to Transform Locally’Research Report of Gehl Institute, [Online]. Available from: https://gehlinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Inclusive-Healthy-Places_Gehl-Institute.pdf [Accessed: 21 January 2024].
Granata, E. (2021) ‘Placemakers’. Gli inventori dei luoghi che abiteremo, Giulio Einaudi.
Kapoor, R. (2017) Youth for Public Spaces: (Place) Making Our Future [Online]. Available from: https://www.pps.org/article/youth-public-spaces-place-making-future [Accessed: 20 January 2024].
Karimnia, E. and Haas, T. (2020) ‘Appropriation of public space. A dialectical approach in designin publicness’ in Mehta, V. and Palazzo, D. (eds.) (2020). Companion to Public Space. 1st edn. London: Routledge.
Lydon M. and Garcia, A. (2015) Tactical Urbanism: short-term action for long-term change. Washington: Island Press.
Madanipour, A. (2020) ‘A critique of public space. Between interaction and attraction’ in Mehta, V. and Palazzo, D. (eds.) (2020). Companion to Public Space. 1st edition. London: Routledge.
Malhotra, A., Dobriyal, R. (2021) ‘Fostering Interactions at Public Open Spaces. The Role of Physical Interface in Facilitating User Interactions in the UAE ‘, The Journal of Public Space, 6(1), [Online]. Available from: https://www.journalpublicspace.org/index.php/jps/issue/view/78 [Accessed: 20 January 2024].
Marko, P. and Lisa, R. (2022) Meanwhile city: How temporary interventions create welcoming places with a strong identity. 1st edition. Auckland: Milk.
McKercher, K. A. (2020) Beyond sticky notes. Doing co-design for Real: Mindsets, Methods, and Movements. 1st edition. Australia: Thorpe-Bowker.
McKoy, D. L., et al. (2021) Planning cities with Young people and schools: Forging Justice, Generating Joy. London: Routledge.
Mehta, V. and Palazzo, D. (eds.) (2020) Companion to Public Space. 1st edition. London: Routledge.
MIUR (Italian Ministry of education) (2016) ‘#ScuoleInnovative. Progettiamo le scuole del futuro’. International call for application for innovative design on schools. Available from: https://www.professionearchitetto.it/news/notizie/17364/La-scuola-del-futuro-le-linee-guida-del-MIUR-per-la-progettazione [Accessed: 29 January 2024].
Nucci, L. and Galimberti, L. (2020). ‘Towards a new school’s role in the Italian contemporary city’ City Territory and Architecture, 7(1), [Online] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-019-0110-3 [Accessed: 15 January 2024].
Peraboni, C. (2020) ‘Inclusione Urbana e progetto della città’, S. Città inclusiva e senza limiti. Progettare luoghi per le persone nella società contemporanea. POLITECNICA 02.1 Available from: https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/1165272.
Santarcangelo di Romagna: Peinhardt, K. and Storring, N. (2019) A Playbook for Inclusive Placemaking: Community Process [Online]. Available from: https://www.pps.org/article/a-playbook-for-inclusive-placemaking-community-process [Accessed: 20 January 2024].
Project for Public Spaces (PPS) (2007) What Is Placemaking? [Online]. Available from: https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking [Accessed: 10 January 2024].
Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L. and Sobel, L. (2016) ‘The Design Thinking Mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice’, Journal of Design Business & Society, 2, pp. 71-94 [Online]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/343756780_Developing_a_Design_Thinking_Mindset_Encouraging_Designerly_Ways_in_Postgraduate_Business_Education [Accessed: 14 January 2024].
Silberberg S., et al., (2013) ‘Places in the making: how placemaking builds places and communities’ [Online]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from: https://issuu.com/mit-dusp/docs/mit-dusp-places-in-the-making [Accessed: 14 January 2024].
Smaniotto Costa, C., et al. (2021) ‘What happens when teenagers reason about public open spaces?’, Cidades Comunidades e Territórios, 43 (December), pp. 139-155.
UN - United Nations General Assembly (2015) ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’, United Nations General Assembly, 70(1), New York. Available from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ [Accessed: 23 January 2024].
Wheeler, J. (2023) The ROI of Placemaking, [Online]. Available from: https://www.fourtheconomy.com/post/the-roi-of-placemaking [Accessed: 18 January 2024].
Whyte, W. H., (1980) The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, D.C., Conservation Foundation, ISBN 0891640576