Renovating Marginalised Urban Areas with Girls and Young Women A Case Study from Sweden
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This article contributes to an understanding of the experience and impact of using gender-inclusive innovative planning tools to engage girls and young women in urban design, and the capacity of this process to democratise urban planning. The article focuses on the narratives of girls from a marginalised area on the outskirts of Stockholm, Sweden, who participated in the feminist urban development project #UrbanGirlsMovement. The article draws on a theoretical framework of feminist urban theory, intersectionality, and territorial stigmatisation, and illustrates how the gender-inclusive urban planning techniques used impacted local girls and re-framed the role of the planner. The girls’ narratives revealed that it was an empowering experience to be part of an urban development process as it enabled them to recognise their own abilities and societal power. The process of engagement gave legitimacy to girls’ ideas and designs, enabling them both to recognise and to use their own agency. Additionally, the process of redesigning a familiar place enabled the girls to regenerate the meaning of their local urban public space to incorporate their own subjective spatial identities. The article argues that intersectional planning tools and processes can help transform spatial inequalities in power and oppression which is crucial when renovating marginalised urban areas of Swedish suburbs. The #UrbanGirlsMovement shows that a planning process can produce more than physical designs; it can be a tool for enhanced democracy, equality, and justice in cities.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Andersson, R. (2017) ‘Segregation: What it is and how it can be measured’, Research Brief, 9, pp.1-8.
Beebeejaun, Y. (2017) ‘Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), pp.323-334.
Block by Block (2019) Fittja Centrum All models - 3D model by Block by Block (@blockbyblock) [printscreen]. Available at: Fittja Centrum All models - Download Free 3D model by Block by Block (@blockbyblock) [0f0a3c2] (sketchfab.com) (Accessed: 26 June 2024)
Butler, J. (2006) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York; London: Routledge.
Ericsson, U., Molina, I. and Ristilammi, P.M. (2002) ‘Miljonprogram och media. Föreställningar om människor och förorter’ [The Million Dwellings Program and the Media. Ideas about people and the suburb], Integrationsverket, Rikantikvarieverket. Trelleborg: Berlings Skogs AB.
Greed, C. (2019) ‘Are we still not there yet? Moving further along the gender highway’, 63 In: Lindkvist Scholten, C. and Joelsson, T. (eds.) Integrating Gender into Transport Planning – One of Many Tracks, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hayden, D. (1980) ‘What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work’, Signs, 5(3), pp.170–187.
Jarvis, H., Cloke, Jo and Kantor, P. (2009) Cities and Gender. Critical Introductions to Urbanism and the City. USA: Routledge.
Larsson, A. and Jalakas, A. (2008) Jämställdhet nästa! Samhällsplanering ur ett genusperspektiv [Equality Next! Urban Planning from a Gender Perspective]. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
Lilja, E. (2000) ‘Periferi och Identitet - den moderna förortens paradox’, Byplan, Dansk Byplanlaboratorium, 2, pp.46–54.
Listerborn, C. (2007) ‘Från Redaktionen’ [From the Editorial Staff], Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, (3), pp.3–5.
Listerborn, C. (2008) ‘Who speaks? And who listens? The relationship between planners and women’s participation in local planning in a multi-cultural urban environment’, GeoJournal, 70, pp.61–74.
Mabala, R. (2006) ‘From HIV prevention to HIV protection: addressing the vulnerability of girls and young women in urban areas’, International Institute for Environment and Development, 18(2), pp.407–432.
Mojang (2009) Minecraft, computer game, screenshot from play 2nd-3rd February 2019. Mojang: Sweden.
Molina, I. (2005) ‘Rasifiering: Ett teoretiskt perspektiv i analysen av diskriminering i Sverige’ [Racialization: A theoretical perspective in the analysis of discrimination in Sweden], in De Los Reyes, P. and Kamali, M. (eds.) Bortom Vi och Dom: Teoretiska reflektioner om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering [Beyond Us and Them: Theoretical reflections on power, integration, and structural discrimination]. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar, pp.187-206.
Molina, I. (2018) ‘Planning for patriarchy? Gender equality in the Swedish modern built environment’, in Staub, A. (ed.) The Routledge companion to modernity, space and gender. New York: Routledge, pp.57-72.
Ortiz Escalante, S. and Gutiérrez Valdivia, B. (2015) ‘Planning from below: using feminist participatory methods to increase women's participation in urban planning’, Gender & Development, 23(1), pp.113-126.
Pripp, O. and Ramberg, I. (eds.) (2002) Fittja, världen och vardagen [Fittja, the world and everyday life]. Tumba: Mångkulturellt centrum.
Rendell, J., Penner, B. and Borden, I. (2000) Gender, Space, Architecture - an interdisciplinary introduction. New York: Routledge.
Rodela, R. and Norss, E. (2022) ‘Opening up spatial planning to the participation of children and youth: the Swedish experience’, European Planning Studies, 31(2), pp.252–269.
Schalk, M. (2017) ’Feministisk stadsplanering: Kollektiva rekonstruktioner’, in Koch, D. and Wingquist, E. (eds.) KTHA #3. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, pp.10-24.
Snyder, M.G. (1995) ‘Feminist theory and planning theory: lessons from feminist epistemologies’, Berkeley Planning Journal, 10(1), pp.91-106.
Spain, D. (2014) ‘Gender and urban space’, The Annual Review of Sociology, 40, pp.581–98.
Swedish Police (2023) Lägesbild över utsatta områden, regeringsuppdrag 2023 [Situational picture of vulnerable areas, Government assignment 2023]. Stockholm: Polismyndigheten.
United Nations (2015) ‘Definition of youth. United Nations Youth’ [Online]. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/youth/fact-sheets/youth-definition.pdf (Accessed: 31 May 2019).
Valentine, G. (2007) ‘Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography’, The Professional Geographer, 59(1), pp.10-21.
Waquant, L. (2007) ‘Territorial Stigmatisation in the age of advanced marginality’, Thesis Eleven, 91, pp.66–77.
Wiberg, S. (2018) ‘Lyssnandets praktik – medborgardialog, icke-vetande och förskjutningar’ [The practice of listening – civil dialogue, non-knowledge, and dislocation], PhD dissertation, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.