Locating Young Women in Public Space A Feminist Spatial Researcher-in-Residence Model
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Young women have largely been left out of public space design and planning processes. There is a need for meaningful knowledge production to be centred on, and grounded within, this group. In this viewpoint, we propose and evaluate our feminist spatial researcher-in-residence methodology for engaging young women in design and planning processes. We developed this model for a series of peer research projects on gender and perceptions of public space, with individuals who identify as girls and young women in the UK from April 2022 to October 2023. We first give an overview of our method which focuses on peer research – notably the researcher-in-residence model – and subsequently go on to discuss two central aspects: (un)learning and visual methods. We argue that such approaches contrast traditional methods of doing research with young people (e.g. surveying), by giving us ways of exploring the banality (eg. benches) and complexity (feelings of safety) of young women’s experiences of the public realm; and by allowing research participants to have greater agency in representing their own lifeworlds. It is our view that this methodology makes the case for why it is essential to value the tacit knowledge that young women and girls have in meaningful and attentive ways if we are to create an inclusive public realm.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Awan, N. and Langley, P. (2013) ‘Mapping migrant territories as topological deformations of space’, Space and Culture, 16(2), pp.229-245.
Barker, A., Holmes, G., Alam, R., Cape-Davenhill, L., Osei-Appiah, S. and Warrington Brown, S. (2022) ‘What Makes a Park Feel Safe or Unsafe? The views of women, girls and professionals in West Yorkshire’.
Berger, J. (2008) Ways of seeing. Penguin UK.
Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013) ‘Toward an architecture of dissensus: Participatory urbanism in South-East Asia’, Footprint, pp.41-62.
Bondi, L. (2016) ‘The place of emotions in research: From partitioning emotion and reason to the emotional dynamics of research relationships’, in Davidson, J., Bondi, L. and Smith, M. (eds.) Emotional geographies , London: Routledge, pp.231-246.
Bradley, G.L. (2010) ‘Skate parks as a context for adolescent development’, Journal of adolescent research, 25(2), pp.288-323.
Browne, K., Banerjea, N., McGlynn, N., Bakshi, L., Banerjee, R. and Biswas, R. (2017) ‘Towards transnational feminist queer methodologies. Gender, Place & Culture’, 24(10), pp.1376-1397.
Caretta, M.A. and Riaño, Y. (2016) ‘Feminist participatory methodologies in geography: creating spaces of inclusion’, Qualitative Research, 16(3), pp.258-266.
Caudwell, J. (2020) ‘Transgender and non-binary swimming in the UK: Indoor public pool spaces and un/safety’, Frontiers in Sociology, 5, p.64.
Causey, A. (2017) Drawn to see: Drawing as an ethnographic method. University of Toronto Press.
Cele, S. (2016) ‘Performing the political through public space: teenage girls' everyday use of a city park’, in Enge, K.I. (ed.) The Beginning of Politics. London: Routledge, pp.74-87.
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001) Participation: The new tyranny?. London: Zed Books.
Corner, J. (1999) ‘The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and invention’, in Cosgrove, D. (ed.) Mappings. London: Reaktion Books, pp.213-252.
Cosgrave, E., Lam, T. and Henderson, Z. (2020) Scoping study: London’s participation in UN Women’s Safer Cities and Safe Public Spaces Programme. UCL Urban Lab.
Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The subject and power. Critical inquiry’, 8(4), pp.777-795.
Girlguiding (2022) Girls’ Attitudes Survey 2022 [Online] Girlguiding. Available at: https://girlguiding.foleon.com/girls-attitudes-survey/2022-report/safety (Accessed: 27 Feb 2023)
Grosvenor Britain and Ireland (2020) I live here too: Why Young People Want a Stake in their neighbourhood [Online]. Grosvenor Britain & Ireland, Sport England, the TCPA and ZCD Architects, London. Available at: https://www.grosvenor.com/getattachment/49d8504f-39ac-4699-b434-b762a67b8c11/YET-executive-summary-2020.pdf (Accessed: 13 January 2022)
Haraway, D. (2013) ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, in Wyer, M., Barbercheck, M., Giesman, D. and Ozturk, H. (eds.) Women, Science, and Technology. London: Routledge, pp.455-472.
Higgins, J., Nairn, K. and Sligo, J. (2007) ‘Peer research with youth: Negotiating (sub) cultural capital, place and participation in Aotearoa/New Zealand’, in Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds.) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. London: Routledge, pp.130-137.
Ibáñez-Carrasco, F., Watson, J.R. and Tavares, J. (2019) ‘Supporting peer researchers: recommendations from our lived experience/expertise in community-based research in Canada’, Harm reduction journal, 16(1), p.55.
Kern, L. (2021) Feminist city: Claiming space in a man-made world. Verso Books.
Kesby, M., Kindon, S. and Pain, R. (2007) ‘Participation as a form of power: Retheorising empowerment and spatialising participatory action research’, in Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds.) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. London: Routledge, pp.45-51.
Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (2007) ‘Introduction: Connecting people, participation and place’, in Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds.) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. London: Routledge, pp.27-32.
King, J., Theocharides-Feldman, O. (2023) Young Researchers in Residence: A model for investigating and designing urban spaces with young people [Online]. Countryside Partnerships, London. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/cities/research/cities-space-and-society/Young-Researchers-in-Residence (Accessed: 12 December 2023)
Larkins, C., Nowland, R., Robertson, L., Farrelly, N., Sharpe, D., Roy, A.N., Morocza, N. and de Lemos, J.B. (2021) ‘Peer research by children and young people and their allies Rapid Evidence Review of best practices in health and social science literature’.
MacKinnon, K.R., Guta, A., Voronka, J., Pilling, M., Williams, C.C., Strike, C. and Ross, L.E. (2021) ‘The political economy of peer research: mapping the possibilities and precarities of paying people for lived experience’, The British Journal of Social Work, 51(3), pp.888-906.
Marshall, M., Pagel, C., French, C., Utley, M., Allwood, D., Fulop, N., Pope, C., Banks, V. and Goldmann, A. (2014) ‘Moving improvement research closer to practice: the Researcher-in-Residence model’, BMJ quality & safety, 23(10), pp.801-805.
Massey, D. (2008) ‘A global sense of place’, in Hubbard, P., Kitchin, R. and Valentine, G. (eds.) The Cultural Geography Reader. London: Routledge, pp.269-275.
McCall, L. (2005) ‘The complexity of intersectionality’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), pp.1771-1800.
Morrow, V. (2008) ‘Ethical dilemmas in research with children and young people about their social environments’, Children’s Geographies, 6(1), pp.49-61.
(MSFG) Make Space for Girls (2023) Walker, S., Clarke I. ‘Make Space for Girls: The Research Background’ [Online]. Available at: https://assets-global.website-files.com/6398afa2ae5518732f04f791/63f60a5a2a28c570b35ce1b5_Make%20Space%20for%20Girls%20-%20Research%20Draft.pdf. (Accessed: 12 December 2023)
O’Toole, T. (2003) ‘Engaging with young people's conceptions of the political’, Children’s Geographies, 1(1), pp.71-90.
Rowntree Park (2021) ‘Making space for girls – older girls and Rowntree Park’ [Online]. Available at: https://rowntreepark.org.uk/making-space-for-girls-older-girls-and-rowntree-park/ (Accessed: 2 February 2024)
Said, E.W. (1989) ‘Representing the colonized: Anthropology’s interlocutors’, Critical Inquiry, 15(2), pp.205-225.
Skelton, T. (2004) ‘Nothing to do, nowhere to go? Teenage girls and public space in the Rhondda Valleys, South Wales’, in Holloway, S.L. and Valentine, G. (eds.) Children's Geographies. London: Routledge, pp.69-85.
Spivak, G.C. (2023) ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. (eds.) Imperialism: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge, pp.171-219.
Tayob, H. (2018) ‘Subaltern architectures: Can drawing “tell” a different story?’, Architecture and Culture, 6(1), pp.203-222.
Young Foundation, Yang, C. and Z. Dibb (2020) Peer Research in the UK [Online]. The Institute of Community Research of the Young Foundation. Available at: https://youngfoundation.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/TheYoungFoundation-PeerResearchInTheUK-final-singles.pdf?x22784 (Accessed: 3 June 2022)
(YWL) Young Women Lead (2021) Glasgow: A Feminist City? Young Women Lead Report 2021 [Online]. Young Women Lead Report. YWCA Scotland. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6413232bf29ba901ed614415/t/64367fbd46b4f85cb868823c/1681293269338/YWL+Glasgow.pdf (Accessed: 6 October 2023).