The regaining of public spaces to enhance the historic urban landscape
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Open spaces in the urban landscapes suffer from deterioration caused by man that leads to two major outcomes: on one side they are abandoned because of newer contemporary needs, on the other hand they tend to be “cannibalized” in the attempt to satisfy our society. This has caused a progressive retraction of urban open spaces that have become residual spaces with no shape and no name.
This course of crisis has damaged the identity of places and this is more acute in historic urban landscapes that are recognised as cultural heritage and world heritage. The historic urban landscape approach suggested by UNESCO recognises public spaces’ importance for society and promotes the acknowledgement of public spaces and their dynamism aiming to the integration of preservation, social development and economic targets.
To understand how “historic urban landscapes” are taking care of their public spaces, a few Management Plans of UNESCO’s World Heritage cities have been compared. Only Italian UNESCO sites with an “urban complex” characterisation have been considered, this means a limited part of a city with homogenous characteristics from a spatial, historic and cultural point of view. We have focused our attention on the specific interventions for the management of open spaces, in order to identify the major targets and their executive tools, projects and actions.
In the light of the above-mentioned analyses, we propose some strategies to fight the decline of public spaces (streets, squares, gardens, etc.) and to enhance these spaces with great attention, trying to improve their fruition and comfort according to their historic and cultural values.
The need to identify design strategies to enhance public spaces within the historic urban landscape is included in the research and test activities carried out in the UNESCO site of Mantova and Sabbioneta. This site is an excellent area of applicability because of its urban shape, molded in years by the Gonzaga family. Together with the UNESCO Mantova e Sabbioneta office, we have involved citizens in the requalification design to activate regaining process and test the applicability of our analyses in the city of Mantova, a very articulated and complex reality, starting from the fruition of its places and according to its morphological, environmental, cultural and perceptive aspects.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Clemente, M. (2001). La città europea. Urbanistica e cooperazione. Giannini Editore.
Comune di Bologna (2014). Regolamento sulla collaborazione tra cittadini e amministrazione per la cura e la rigenerazione dei beni comuni urbani. Bologna. February 22, 2014.
Council of Europe (2000). European Landscape Convention.
Council of Europe (2005). Faro Convention.
D.Lgs. 22 gennaio 2004, n. 42. Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio ai sensi dell’articolo 10 della legge 6 luglio 2002, n. 137. Art. 10, point g.
Daverio, P. (2010). Estetica degli spazi pubblici. Atti della Conferenza internazionale “Spazi pubblici e qualità urbana. Approcci innovativi e buone pratiche”, Parma, 11 giugno 2010.
Ferrara, City of Renaissance and its Po Delta (2002). Management Plan.
Gambaro, M. (2012). Environmental design and landscape. In Bolici, R. and Gambaro, M. and Tartaglia, A. Research among innovation, creativity and design. Firenze University Press: 53-59.
Gangemi, V. (2001), Emergenza Ambiente. Teorie e sperimentazioni della Progettazione Ambientale,CLEAN.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: using public space. Washington – Covelo – London, Island Press.
Giordano, C. (2015). La riqualificazione dello spazio pubblico per valorizzare il territorio. Dal Distretto Culturale Le Regge dei Gonzaga alla “Città UNESCO diffusa dei Gonzaga”. Tesi di dottorato in Progetto e tecnologie per la valorizzazione dei beni culturali.
Gregotti V. (2002), La costruzione dello spazio pubblico. Alinea Editrice.
HerO, Heritage as Opportunity (2011). URBACT II thematic network.
Historic Centre of Florence (2006). Management Plan.
Historic Centre of Naples (2011). Management Plan.
Historic Centre of Siena (2011). Management Plan.
Historic Centre of the City of Pienza (2005). Management Plan.
Historic Centre of Urbino (2012). Management Plan.
Jappelli, F. (2012). Street design. Progetto di strade e disegno dello spazio pubblico. Maggioli Editore: 1-33.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press. Cambridge.
Mantova and Sabbioneta (2006). Management Plan.
OWHC, Organization of World Heritage Cities (2013). Conference documents. “Changing cities and heritage management: new players? new practices?”, Lyon Meeting.
Peraboni, C. and Corsini, D. (2001). Spazi pubblici. Visioni multiple per spazi complessi. Maggioli Editore.
Romano, M. (1993). L’estetica della città europea. Einaudi.
Schiaffonati, F. et al (2001). Progetto e tecnologie per la valorizzazione dei beni culturali. Quaderni del dottorato PTVBC n. 1/2011. Maggioli editore.
Schiaffonati, F. (1994). Una concezione del bello che non sia maquillage. In Ubertazzi, A. (1994). La qualità diffusa. Progetti museali Roma.
SITI, Sistemi Territoriali per l’Innovazione (2012). Evaluating the management of UNESCO sites. Monitoring the management plans of the Italian sites inscribed into the World Heritage List. Celid. Torino, pp. 13-42.
TEMA-Technology Environment and Management - Bolici R., Poltronieri A., Giordano C., Leali G., Mirandola S. (2015). OURS 2.0 - Mantova città Patrimonio Mondiale, Progetto di ricerca del Politecnico di Milano-Polo Territoriale di Mantova, Dipartimento ABC, Laboratorio Ricerca Mantova, TEMA-Technology Environment and Management. Progetto realizzato in collaborazione con l’Ufficio UNESCO Mantova e Sabbioneta, finanziato da Fondazione Cariplo “Interventi emblematici-anno 2012” - Azione 6 - Tempo della partecipazione e della collettività del progetto “Il tempo dei giovani. Territori e lavori per lo sviluppo e la crescita”. Secondo classificato al Concorso di Idee “La cultura come un bene comune” promozione condivisa dello sviluppo e dell’identità turistico - culturale del territorio mantovano promosso dalla Provincia di Mantova e For.MA, con il supporto di Camera di Commercio di Mantova e il contributo di Fondazione Cariplo.
Ubertazzi, A. (1994). La qualità diffusa. Progetti museali Roma.
UNESCO, World Heritage Centre (2005). World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture. Vienna Memorandum.
UNESCO, World Heritage Centre (2011). Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape.