Designing the city from public space. A contribution to (re)think the urbanistic role of public space in the contemporary enlarged city

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Cover image: Grant Stewart. University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Picture by Andy Day.
PDF
Published: Mar 1, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/jps.v2i1.53
Keywords:
public space landscape contemporary city urban project urban regeneration

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Rodrigo Coelho
Universidade do Porto

Abstract

Considering the tendency for expansion, diversification and fragmentation of the present city´s urban spaces, and considering that in the last decades public space lost much of the formal and functional attributes that it held in the past (in the historical city), the main problem that we currently face as architects and planners, seems to be how to articulate and (re) build (new) public places that materialise, in a qualified manner, the collective experience (the new ways of living, social interaction and displacement) of the “newer parts” of the city, and that simultaneously incorporate attributes that transform them into memorable and perennial spaces - landmarks of the city that is to come.
The recent practical and theoretical outputs contradictorily appear to demonstrate a relative devaluation of the structuring role of public space, especially in those less consolidated parts of the city. Regarding the architectonic and urbanistic practice, we conclude that, in a time of mediatisation of architecture (in particular by the enhancement of the image and of iconographic values), the construction of the city and the materialisation of public space expresses, in many cases, generic and epidermal responses with visible consequences in terms of urban structure and perception of the city. Regarding the theoretic outputs, the insights also do not appear, in general, to contribute towards a theoretical framework committed to a consistent practical knowledge, or the resolution of the key issues and challenges that the city faces today.
Taking into account these considerations, and starting with a brief diagnosis that will focus on the major “weaknesses or controversies” that we identify in the theoretical discourse on the city and on public space, this paper will seek to focus on the importance of the urbanistic vocation of public space by identifying three main issues or key purposes to think and retrieve the public space project in the contemporary city. The three key purposes that will help us to recognize the strategic importance of public space in the contemporary European “enlarged city”, and that will be analysed by using a case study, are:
- The public space as an ordering element of “new urban expansion”;
- The public space as a factor of reconstruction of the “city without a plan”;
- The public space as a (re)structuring element of the “metropolitan city”.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Coelho, R. (2017) “Designing the city from public space. A contribution to (re)think the urbanistic role of public space in the contemporary enlarged city”, The Journal of Public Space, 2(1), pp. 95–108. doi: 10.5204/jps.v2i1.53.
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017)
Section
Society

The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

 

Author Biography

Rodrigo Coelho, Universidade do Porto

Rodrigo Coelho (Zamora, Spain, 1971) is graduated in architecture from the Faculty of Architecture of the University of Porto (FAUP) and holds a Master in Architecture and Urban Studies from the Polytechnic University of Catalonia and Centre of Contemporary Culture of Barcelona. In 2012 he presented his PhD thesis in Architecture at the Faculty of Architecture of University of Porto.
He is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Architecture of the University of Porto and Deputy Director of the Centre for Architecture and Urban Studies CEAU-FAUP, where he develops, as an integrated member, research on the subject of public space.
His PHD thesis was awarded (ex-aequo) with the 1st prize of VIII Iberoamerican Biennial of Architecture and Urbanism (2012) in the category of Academic Theses.

References

Fernandes F., Cannatà M. (ed.).(2006). A arquitectura do Metro, obras e projectos na Área Metropolitana do Porto. Porto: Civilização.

Aymonino A., Mosco V. P. (2006). Contemporary Public Space. Un-volumetric Architecture. Milano: Skira.

Acebillo J. A. (1989). “Struttura e significato dello spazio urbano”. In Spazi Pubblici Contemporanei. Inovazione e identità a Barcelona e in Catalogna”. Quaderni di AU, pp. 28-36.

Bohigas O. (1999). “La Cuidad como Espacio Proyectado”. In La Arquitectura del Espacio Público: Formas del Passado, Formas del Presente. Sevilha: Junta de Andalucia – Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes e Triennale di Milano, pp. 21-24.

Bohigas O. (2004). Contra la incontinencia urbana: reconsideración moral de la arquitectura y la ciudad. Barcelona: Electa (Diputació de Barcelona; Xarxa de Municipis).

Borja J., Muxi Z. (2003). El espacio público: ciudad y cuidadania. Barcelona: Electa.

Busquets J. (2004). “Presente y perspectivas del urbanismo”. In Sociedade e Territorio, n. 37-38, pp. 46-60.

Busquets, J., Correa F. (2006). Cities X Lines: A new lens for the urbanistic project. Cambridge: Harvard University (Graduate School of Design). Nicolodi.

Busquets J. (2005). “Entrevistas: 20 visiones”. In Papers. Regió Metropolitana de Barcelona, n. 43, Junio, pp. 26, 27.

Tapparelli C. (2006). “Cambiare la città…pezzo dopo pezzo”, interview to Eduardo Souto de Moura, Casabella. 739-740 (December 2005 - January 2006), pp. 116-117.

Huet B. (1999). “Tre questioni a proposito della forma urbana”.In Questioni di forma…urbana. La composizione dello spazio pubblico nel rinuovo della città. Firenze : Alinea, pp. 5-9.

Innerarity D. 2006). El Nuevo espacio público. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.

Martí Aris C. (2005). “Lugares Públicos en la Naturaleza”. In La Cimbra y el Arco. Barcelona: Fundación Caja de Arquitectos, pp. 55-72.

Martí Aris C., “Lugares Públicos”. Conference held at Colegio de Arquitectos de Madrid, April 26, 2001, policopied author’s edition.

Martí Aris C., (1999). “la Construcción de los Lugares Públicos, Notas para una Etimologia de la Forma Urbana”. In Arquitectos n. 152, Información del Consejo Superior de los Colegios de Arquitectos de España n. 99/4, V Bienal de Arquitectura Española, pp. 52-57.

Portas, N. (1999). “Espacio público y ciudad emergente”. In La Arquitectura del Espacio Público: Formas del Passado, Formas del Presente. Sevilha: Junta de Andalucia – Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes e Triennale di Milano, pp. 55-57.

Secchi B. (2000). Prima lezioni di urbanistica. Roma: Laterza.

Secchi B. (2006). “Land design 2”. In Contemporary Public Space. Un-volumetric Architecture. Milano: Skira, pp. 287-291.

Solà-Morales M. (1987). “La segunda historia del proyecto urbano” In UR, n. 5, pp. 21-27.

Solà-Morales M. (2008). De cosas urbanas. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Solà-Morales M. (2010). “The Impossible Project of Public Space”. In Magda Anglès (ed.), In favour of public space: ten years of the European prize. Barcelona: Actar, pp. 24-32.

Souto de Moura, E. (2006). “Projecto de Arquitectura para o Metro do Porto”. In Fátima Fernandes, Michele Cannatà (ed.), A arquitectura do Metro, obras e projectos na Área Metropolitana do Porto. Porto: Civilização, p. 31.