Facilitating Spatial Negotiation: a pragmatic approach to understanding public space
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The workshop ‘Facilitating Spatial Negotiation’, which took place as part of the ‘Past, Present and Future of Public Space’ International conference on Art, Architecture and Urban Design that took place in Bologna (2014), promoted by City Space Architecture, demonstrates a pragmatic approach to understanding how public space can be realised. The method of collaborative painting is employed within a participatory practice that adopts tactics from spatial agency and critical spatial practice. First, this paper provides a descriptive and visual insight into the discussion between six participants on the topic of the street as a public space, in light of the Social Street movement. Then, it sets out how the session can be understood, through analogy, as a creative exercise in performing a common space. By reflecting upon this event through the framework of participatory practice, the focus is on how conflict is revealed and negotiated within the group. Two instants of conflict are discussed, which raise the critical question whether people are, in fact, interested in working together towards the production and use of common space. It is suggested that the implications of this workshop are twofold. First, a truly public space cannot be realised if the principles of common space are not adopted within the process of its negotiation. Secondly, the finding of a common language in the process of negotiating public space is crucial to this process. The painterly approach offers a shared visual forum, but ultimately the use of any facilitating medium depends on people’s responsibility to participate.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Donszelmann, B. (2009). Proposal for a Materialist Arena: Painted Space. In Occupation: Negotiations with Constructed Space. Brighton: University of Brighton School of Architecture and Design. Retrieved from http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/44822/13_Bernice-Donszelmann_Proposal-for-a-materialist-arena.pdf
Miessen, M. (2010). The Nightmare of Participation (Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality). Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Mlicka, A. (2014). Painting Architecture: Towards a Practice-Led Research Methodology. Studies in Material Thinking, 10, 1–19.
Rendell, J. (2006). Art and Architecture: a Place Between. London: I.B. Tauris.
Till, J. (2005). The Negotiation of Hope. In Architecture and Participation (pp. 25–44). New York: Routledge.
Till, J. (2009). Architecture Depends. Cambridge [Mass.]: MIT Press.
Till, J. (2011). “The King Is Dead! Long Live the Queen!.” In Waking Up from the Nightmare of Participation (pp. 163–167). Utrecht: Expodium.