Time for action. Implementing the New Urban Agenda in public spaces for health and wellbeing
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Urban Agendas are important guiding tools that frame thinking and point to major directions and changes needed. The dominant planning and city development practices in the 20th century resulted in the proliferation of modern cities that brought numerous problems that urban planners and designers are still dealing with. Do we have the capacity and appropriate tools to change the cities of tomorrow to make them more liveable places?
The challenges may seem overwhelming. However, there are advantages in strategies that combine acting locally and synergising with other places. Using insights from the Urban Synergies Group this paper represents a summary of initial pathways that may effectively implement the NUA (New Urban Agenda) – a collective vision for sustainable and healthy cities. To address the main issues of the NUA we discuss five key themes. First, we consider the level of commitment to achieve healthier cities for all during the 9th World Urban Forum (WUF 9). Second, we narrow our focus to examine child health and well-being. Third, we introduce an exemplary collaboration that harnesses collective wisdom through empowerment of participants. Fourth, we provide the rationale for the focus on public space. Within the fifth point we summarise tangible actions within the nexus of child health and public space that help to implement the NUA on the ground.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The Authors retain copyright for articles published in The Journal of Public Space, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial Licence (CC-BY-NC) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You are free to:
• Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
• Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Bravo, L., Carmagnini, C., & Matityhou, N. (2013). Lighter, Quicker, cheaper: towards an Urban Activism Manifesto, in Sbetti, F., Rossi, F., Talia, M. and Trillo, C. (eds.), Il governo della città nella contemporaneità. La città come motore di sviluppo, “Urbanistica on line”, Dossier n. 4, XXVIII INU Congress proceedings, INU Edizioni, Roma, pp. 33-36.
Bundy, A. C., Naughton, G., Tranter, P., Wyver, S., Baur, L., Schiller, W., . . . Brentnall, J. (2011). The Sydney playground project: popping the bubblewrap - unleashing the power of play: a cluster randomized controlled trial of a primary school playground-based intervention aiming to increase children’s physical activity and social skills. BMC Public Health, 11:680.
Debord, G. (1994). The Society of the Spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Camebridge & London: MIT Press.
Fjørtoft, I. (2001). The natural environment as a playground for children: The impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children. Early childhood education journal, 29(2), 111-117.
Gill, T. (2007). No Fear: growing up in a Risk Averse Society. London: Calouste Gulbenkain Foundation.
Gill, T. (2017, 18 July 2017). Crucial indicator for a successful, healthy city: Children. The Inquirer.
Gleeson, B., & Sipe, N. (2006). Creating child friendly cities : reinstating kids in the city. London ; New York: Routledge.
Hart, R. (2013). Children's participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. The City Reader, 6, 23-40.
Herrington, S., & Brussoni, M. (2015). Beyond Physical Activity: The Importance of Play and Nature-Based Play Spaces for Children’s Health and Development. Current Obesity Reports, 4(4), 477-483. doi:10.1007/s13679-015-0179-2.
Iveson, K. (1998). Putting the public back into public space. Urban Policy and Research, 16(1), 21-33.
Jones, A. P. (1999). Indoor air quality and health. Atmospheric Environment, 33(28), 4535-4564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00272-1.
Knapp, K. (2006). Situationist International Anthology Berkley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets.
Lopes, M. L., Blick, M., & Pfausch, S. (2018). Material that make heat worse for our kids demand a rethink by designers. Retrieved from the conversation website: http://theconversation.com/materials-that-make-heat-worse-for-our-kids-demand-a-rethink-by-designers-93274
Malone, K. (2001). Children, Youth and Sustainable Cities. Local Environment, 6(1), 5-12. doi:10.1080/13549830120024215.
Manfredini, M., Gharaghooshi, F. Z., & Leardini, P. (2017). Instances of emerging agonistic spatialities in the contemporary city the production of differential geographies in the public space of Istanbul. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321–2799), 5(05).
Mews, G. (2018). Shaping Healthy Cities for and with Children: Side Networking Event Report. Retrieved from Canberra, Australia and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: https://urbansynergiesgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/WUF9-Report.pdf.
Mews, G., Cochrane, T., Davey, R. (2017). Shaping Spaces for Gen Z – International Forum Report: Urban Thinkers Campus. (978-0-9954095-2-1, 0-9954095-2-8, ). Retrieved from Canberra, Australia: https://urbansynergiesgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SS4GenZ-Report_Web.pdf.
Mierzejewska, L. (2011). Appropriation of Public Urban Space as an Effect of Privatisation and Globalisation. In Quaestiones Geographicae (Vol. 30, pp. 39).
Muminovic, M. (2016). Place identity and sustainable urban regeneration: Public space in Canberra City Centre. Urban Regeneration & Sustainability, 374.
Ng, M. K. (2016). The right to healthy place-making and well-being. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 3. Doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1139227.
O'Brien, M., Jones, D., & Rustin, M. (2000). Children's independent spatial mobility in the public realm. Childhood, 7. Doi:10.1177/0907568200007003002.
Page, A. S., Cooper, A. R., Griew, P. J., & Jago, R. (2010). Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children's participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: the PEACH Project. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7.
Renz-Polster, H., & Hüther, G. (2013). Wie Kinder heute wachsen (How children grow today, Trans.). Weinheim & Basel: Beltz.
Seeland, K., Dübendorfer, S., & Hansmann, R. (2009). Making friends in Zurich's urban forests and parks: The role of public green space for social inclusion of youths from different cultures. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 10-17. Doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.005.
Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to Participation: Openings, Opportunities and Obligations: A New Model for Enhancing Children's Participation in Decision-Making, in Line with Article 12.1 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Children & Society, 15(2), 107-117.
Spencer, K. H., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Quality Outdoor Play Spaces for Young Children. Young Children, 28-34.
Tham, K. W. (2016). Indoor air quality and its effects on humans—A review of challenges and developments in the last 30 years. Energy and Buildings, 130, 637-650. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.071.
Tieben, H. (2016). Public Space Trends in Hong Kong. A view from the New Territories. The Journal of Public Space, 1(1), 25-34.
Tranter, P. (2006). Overcoming social traps: a key to creating child friendly cities. In B. Gleeson, Sipe, N., (Ed.), Creating child friendly cities: reinstating kids in the city (pp. 121 - 135). Oxon, Canada, New York, USA: Routledge.
Tranter, P. (2014). Active Travel: A Cure for the Hurry Virus. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(1), 65-76. Doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.865153.
UN-Habitat. (2018). The Ninth session of the World Urban Forum. Retrieved from Nairobi: http://wuf9.org/wp-content/uploads/presentation/Post-WUF9-presentation.pdf.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. General Assembly Resolution 44/25 of 20th November 1989. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.
United Nations. (2017). New Urban Agenda (H. I. Secretariat Ed.). Quito, Ecuador UN-Habitat.
Valentine, G., & mckendrick, J. (1997). Children's Outdoor Play: Exploring Parental Concerns About Children's Safety and the Changing Nature of Childhood. Geoforum, 28(2), 219-235.
Vallée, J., Cadot, E., Roustit, C., Parizot, I., & Chauvin, P. (2011). The role of daily mobility in mental health inequalities: The interactive influence of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on depression. Social Science & Medicine, 73(8), 1133-1144. Doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.009.
Veitch, J., Bagley, S., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2006). Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children's active free-play. Health & Place, 12(4), 383-393. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.02.009.
World Health Organisation. (1998). Health Promotion Glossary. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/about/HPR%20Glossary%201998.pdf?Ua=1.
World Health Organisation. (2008). World report on child injury prevention Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43851/9789241563574_eng.pdf?Sequence=1.
World Health Organisation. (2010). Global recommendation on physical actitivity for health Retrieved from www.who.int.
Wyver, S., Tranter, P., Naughton, G., Little, H., Sandseter, E. B. H., & Bundy, A. (2010). Ten ways to restrict children's freedom to play: The problem of surplus safety. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(3), 263-277.